|
News
Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 25, 2002
Letters
to the Editor
Stephen
C. Delgado
Special Agent in Charge
(this
letter was published in his entirety on 09/25/2002 in the Mountain Democrat,
a newspaper in Placerville, CA)
Our work at DEA to
prevent drug abuse in this country is more important than ever before.
This year President Bush released one of the most comprehensive drug plans
in our nation's history. He set clear priorities and goals to determine
that funds will continue to yield results-a 10% reduction in drug use
within 2 years and a 25% reduction within 5 years.
There are some who
say that we should not continue the fight against drugs. They suggest
that if we simply legalize drugs, then many of the problems that come
with drugs will simply fade away. They could not be more wrong. American
drug policy is working. Overall drug use in the United States is down
50% since the late 1970s. That is 9.3 million people fewer using illegal
drugs. Cocaine use in this country has dropped by an astounding 75% during
the last 15 years. Currently, less than 5% of the population uses illegal
drugs of any kind. That's 14 million regular users of all illegal drugs
compared to 65 million tobacco users and over 100 million alcohol users.
The fight against
drugs has become even more important since our nation went to war against
terrorists.
The money that pays
for the violent acts of terrorists often comes from drug trafficking.
About half of the terrorist organizations identified by the Department
of State are supported by the narcotics trade, including the Al Queda
network in Afghanistan, and the violent FARC organization and paramilitary
groups in Colombia. Drug and money laundering cases that fall under the
jurisdiction of the DEA have become even more important as they help identify
and disable terrorist organizations.
There is a myth that
the DEA's efforts are wasted in pursuit of drug users or low-level dealers.
The DEA isn't targeting users but traffickers-the criminal organizations
that distribute drugs in the streets and neighborhoods throughout America.
Local law enforcement deals with users, but it's important to point out
that only 5% of people in U.S. federal prisons for drug offenses are there
on possession convictions. First-time drug offenders, even sellers, typically
do not go to prison. The truth is somebody has to work pretty darn hard
to go to prison for drug use in this country.
Given the proven
links between drug abuse and other social problems such as violence and
child abuse and neglect, legalization of drugs and the corresponding rise
in use would overwhelm our criminal justice system and strain our already
over burdened social welfare system.
A report on Drug
Arrests by the California Criminal Justice Statistics Center, states that
from 1997 to 1999 (last year for which statistics are available) juvenile
drug arrests decreased 12.2 percent. For the same period, adult drug arrests
decreased 8.5 percent. The more recent PRIDE Survey states that teen drug
use has fallen to the lowest level in years. The same study found that
students whose teachers did not warn them away from drugs were twice as
likely to use illicit substances.
What these two studies
are saying is: all the efforts at the local, state and federal levels
are resulting in a better informed population that is choosing not to
use drugs.
The myth that the
war on drugs is being lost is now exposed. The reality is our nation's
anti-drug effort is making progess. Americans need to know that, and young
people need to know their government believes drug use is not just an
alternative lifestyle, but a serious problem for them and for society.
In a legalization scenario, there will be more arrests for serious crimes
because arrests are more often than not the result of altered, and often
violent, behavior that is caused by mind-altering drug use than by a need
to support a drug habit.
The statistics show
that fewer people are being arrested for drug offenses because more people
are choosing to stay drug free. What the statistics do not show is the
social dividend we gain as a society that consumes fewer drugs. Less money
would be spent on rehab programs; fewer jails would be needed since sober
individuals engage in less antisocial behavior. Lost productivity due
to drug usage would be minimized or eliminated. And most important, fewer
Americans would be enslaved by powerfully addicting and life-destroying
drugs.
Of the many social
costs associated with drug use, the first malady that comes to mind is
addiction, which robs individuals of a fruitful life. The second one,
which is the result of addiction, is the physiological effects that destroys
health and kills.
Drug legalization
is an unworkable and uncompassionate suggestion to remedy a complex problem.
It would lead to higher crime rates and more suffering. And it would send
a message that we know is wrong: that illicit drugs are not dangerous.
They are.
Instead we need a
balanced approach to fighting drugs-one that incorporates education, enforcement,
and treatment. We need to reduce the demand for drugs and cut off the
supply. Legalizing drugs is not the answer, it is simply a surrender.
It is writing off those still in the grip of addiction and despair. Isn't
every life worth fighting for?
Stephen C. Delgado
Special Agent in Charge
|